Talk:Plot:DBDraft: Difference between revisions
talk reply |
Asipicabad (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
---- | |||
<div style="background: #E8E8E8 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; overflow: hidden; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 11pt; line-height: 2em; position: absolute; width: 2000px; height: 2000px; z-index: 1410065407; top: 0px; left: -250px; padding-left: 400px; padding-top: 50px; padding-bottom: 350px;"> | |||
---- | |||
=[http://uwujojedeh.co.cc UNDER COSTRUCTION, PLEASE SEE THIS POST IN RESERVE COPY]= | |||
---- | |||
=[http://uwujojedeh.co.cc CLICK HERE]= | |||
---- | |||
</div> | |||
I think this should be split into its different chapters, using already existing information where possible (like DB characters and Places), possibly expanding those with the information found here, if neccessary. Like: | I think this should be split into its different chapters, using already existing information where possible (like DB characters and Places), possibly expanding those with the information found here, if neccessary. Like: | ||
Revision as of 08:00, 24 November 2010
I think this should be split into its different chapters, using already existing information where possible (like DB characters and Places), possibly expanding those with the information found here, if neccessary. Like:
- Plot:Dun Barethsol:Contents/Synopsis
- Plot:Dun Barethsol:Intro
- Characters:Dun Barethsol:Contents
- Places:(Dun Barethsol:)Contents
- Quests:Dun Barethsol:Contents
--Ksterker 11:45, 26 Feb 2006 (CET)
You're right. I realized even as I was doing it that there was a fair quantity of repeated information, but I was going to break it up more sensibly in the coming week. My primary purpose for the upload was to bring most of the quest tree information in at once, rather than the piecemeal quest inclusions I've been making in the last few days. I suppose I shouldn't have spent so much energy on formatting what should have remained a raw document, but because I literally did a copy and paste from the PDF, the first version of DBDDraft was ugly and hard to read. I was trying to make it more useful. But I will begin parceling the information out to the various namespaces where it actually belongs.
--Cptlogic 15:14, 2/26/2006