Talk:Items:Weapons:Contents: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I am wondering how the item namespace should be organized. I am unsure whether we should use a long list of individual files for all the variations on a specific kind of weapon, or use a basic article for each type of weapon - dagger, sword, bow, spear, etc - and include all variations of type and construction in subsections of that base article. | I am wondering how the item namespace should be organized. I am unsure whether we should use a long list of individual files for all the variations on a specific kind of weapon, or use a basic article for each type of weapon - dagger, sword, bow, spear, etc - and include all variations of type and construction in subsections of that base article. | ||
-- [[ | -- [[User:Cptlogic|Cptlogic]] 20:18GMT 3/9/2006 | ||
That makes the most sense, I think. We can also add links to artifacts of the same category. | |||
--[[User:Ksterker|Ksterker]] 09:34, 10 Mar 2006 (CET) | |||
Latest revision as of 08:34, 10 March 2006
I am wondering how the item namespace should be organized. I am unsure whether we should use a long list of individual files for all the variations on a specific kind of weapon, or use a basic article for each type of weapon - dagger, sword, bow, spear, etc - and include all variations of type and construction in subsections of that base article.
-- Cptlogic 20:18GMT 3/9/2006
That makes the most sense, I think. We can also add links to artifacts of the same category.
--Ksterker 09:34, 10 Mar 2006 (CET)